Best Players Not In the Pro Football Hall of Fame: Wide Receivers
Cliff Branch
Our position-by-position look at the best eligible players not in the Pro Football Hall of Fame continues with a spotlight on the position where HOF voters have arguably displayed the most inconsistency in their choices: wide receiver.
Perhaps more than any other position, the role and statistics associated with wide receiver has changed dramatically over the last fifty years as the NFL record books have gone from no players with 500 career receptions in 1960 and only four in 1970 to 106 today, including 85 who have joined the club since 1990.
For that reason, the Hall of Fame selectors seem to be in a constant struggle with history to try and deduce which former pass catchers belong in Canton.
Of the 20 modern era wide receivers in the Hall of Fame, only seven were selected in their first four years of eligibility. In fact, the last wide receiver to be selected to the Hall of Fame in his first season of eligibility was Steve Largent in 1995.
Since Largent’s induction, eight wide receivers have been selected to the Hall of Fame with only Michael Irvin (third year) being chosen in his first five years on the ballot.
While Hall of Fame voters have generally withstood the temptation to select receivers to the Hall of Fame based solely on career statistics, what the explosion of receiving totals has done is overshadow the legitimate candidacy of players who played the position in the era before receivers started averaging 70 or more catches per season.
Drew Pearson
The selection of Bob Hayes to the Hall of Fame this year is a good step toward recognizing players who excelled at the position before statistics became so bloated. However, there are still many Hall of Fame deserving former receivers who were instrumental members of championship teams and possess career resumes equal or better than those of players who are already inducted.
This list includes some recently retired players who will certainly receive the call from the Hall of Fame in the next few years, but it also looks at some all-time greats who were considered legitimate Hall of Fame candidates at the time of their retirements, but have since been lost in the sea of statistics.
In developing this list, each player was evaluated in the context of the time in which he played and for many of the older players, I highlight where they ranked all-time at the time of their retirement.
I also looked at how each compared against other players (Hall of Famers and non-Hall of Famers) from that era and whether, at the time of his retirement, the player was considered a legitimate candidate for the Hall of Fame.
Below is a list of my choices for the top 10 wide receivers not in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Click Here to read more and see pictures of each player in the top 10.
10. Gary Clark – Washington Redskins/Phoenix Cardinals/Miami Dolphins – 1985-1995
9. Sterling Sharpe – Green Bay Packers – 1988-1994
8. Mark Clayton – Miami Dolphins/Green Bay Packers – 1983-1993
7. Otis Taylor – Kansas City Chiefs – 1965-1975
6. Harold Carmichael –Philadelphia Eagles/Dallas Cowboys – 1971-1984
5. Henry Ellard – Los Angeles Rams/Washington Redskins/New England Patriots– 1983-1998
4. Andre Reed – Buffalo Bills/Washington Redskins – 1985-2000
3. Cris Carter – Philadelphia Eagles/Minnesota Vikings/Miami Dolphins – 1987-2002
2. Drew Pearson – Dallas Cowboys – 1973-1983
1. Cliff Branch – Oakland Raiders – 1973-1985
Agreed that there are several WRs not in the HoF who should be. Compared to RBs and QBs, HoF voters seem to be more stringent with this skill position. Agree that Branch, Pearson, and Carmichael are good choices as unfortunate snubs (Ellard and Reed may prove to be equally bad snubs down the road and Sharpe deserves more credit for his great but short career, though Carter is getting in soon enough). Would make a plea for the following WRs as being far worse snubs than Clark or Clayton: Billy Howton, Billy Wilson, Lionel Taylor, Harold Jackson, Stanley Morgan, and Mac Speedie (short career). And Irving Fryar deserves more credit than he gets when you add in his kick returning abilities.
I may be a little partial to Gary Clark because we grew up near each other and went to the same college, but I thought he was never given his full due in Washington. He was spectacular for a decade and really freed up Monk to make so many catches and put up his HOF numbers. I had Harold Jackson as number 11 and agree with most of the others you mention as at least being worthy of consideration. I think Clayton was great in conjunction with Duper and they both made life much easier for Marino.
Let me to bookmark this after that put aside the perfect time to examine it and also re-read it again. Thank you for writing this sort of wonderful content material with Feed. As i only occasionally work with these.
I have been surfing online more than 3 hours right now, yet I never discovered any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all website owners and bloggers made very good content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.
Excellent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too wonderful. I really like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you are saying and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it smart. I can not wait to read much more from you. This is really a wonderful site.
ywmvgkkz
min B advanced specifically, your body is more susceptible to yeast infection. http://www.veryhandan.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=126898&pid=296791&page=1&extra=#pid296791 , Part of the therapy for Candida or a method to remedy yeast infection naturally is to take dietary supplements and eat me
I hope you do not stop! This is among the most best blog Ive possibly read
Please email me with some hints & tips on how you made this blog look like this, Id appreciate it!