Roundup: What the Miami Masters Means For …
Andy Roddick topped the towering Tomas Berdych on Sunday in Miami.
In the years since then tennis has seen forehand power become commonplace, and Roddick’s faith in himself has at times been shaken because of the lopsided nature of his “rivalry” with Roger Federer, having won just two of 21 matches they’ve played.
All the while, Roddick has sought to add depth to his game, coming to net more frequently, relying more on a slice backhand, and attempting to force mistakes from opponents through a greater reliance on defense.
Through all the disappointments and the changes in coaching, it has been easy for commentators (this one included) to decry that change in his approach, as Roddick’s speed cannot be confused with that of Rafael Nadal’s, and he has never been known for having hands like John McEnroe’s.
As of this week Roddick may have proved us wrong. The American ace machine’s serve remains deadly as ever, but faced with players with superior back court games, his net rushing proved the difference against Nadal and his choice to take the speed off the ball left Tomas Berdych completely flustered. In doing so, he won his first Masters shield in nearly four years.
After a lackluster season post-Wimbledon last year, Roddick has now won two titles in 2010 and reached the finals of two Masters Series events in a row. Now, how does he approach clay, having made measurable progress on the surface last year? He could do as he did then, and skip the first few events, but in ’09 he was getting married; he probably doesn’t have such a good excuse this time.
Tomas Berdych: The lanky Czech is one of those to make the term “big forehand” passé in recent years, as he is unquestionably one of the game’s biggest hitters, yet has had middling results, peaking at No. 4 and never getting past the quarters of a major.
Anyone who hates to see human potential wasted has to hope that this result will be a breakthrough. For one, Berdych beat Roger Federer for the first time in nearly six years. For another, he could easily have suffered a letdown from that result, but managed to overcome Fernando Verdasco in the following round. Meanwhile, Robin Soderling is probably still smarting from the beating Berdych administered on him on the semis.
Tomas Berdych made progress in Miami, but questions about his game remain.
What’s worrisome is that, after achieving all that, Berdych was taken so completely out of his own game by Roddick’s off-speed pitching in the final.
For all the pluses his win over Federer revealed – his accurate serving, his ability to crush short balls off either wing – there were also shortcomings revealed, particularly in his return of serve and the margin of error on his forehand.
Rafael Nadal: The Spaniard finishes the spring hard court season, having won no titles since last year’s clay season began. Still, this writer isn’t worried, at least not yet: In his semifinal performances in Indian Wells and Miami Nadal racked up quite a few impressive wins, only to fall to a hard-serving hot hand in three sets.
That Nadal is more talented than Roddick or Ivan Ljubicic would be hard to dispute, so his losses to them must be frustrating. Still, when he arrives on clay, that little bit of extra time ought to make all the difference in restoring him to his winning ways.
If he fails to lift the Monte Carlo trophy for the sixth (has it been that long already?) straight time, then we’ll be worried.
Roger Federer: The Great Swiss has not won Indian Wells or Miami since 2006, when he won both for the second straight year. For now Federer still has 16 Masters shields, one shy of Andre Agassi’s record. Even with 16 the more prestigious Grand Slam titles to his name, Federer’s frustration in his narrow loss to Berdych was speaks clearly as to what that record would mean to him.
In the last two seasons, a switch to clay brought an upswing in Federer’s play, something which ought to make the rest of the tour highly uncomfortable.
It appears Larry Stefanki's guidance has paid off for Andy Roddick.
Larry Stefanki: Perhaps Roddick’s current coach does know something that Jimmy Connors and Brad Gilbert did not, as his protégé has succeeded in
lifting his play following a series of setbacks. For Roddick, whose results have tended to stagnate when under the same coach for more than a year, this is good news.
It also is for Stefanki, whose job looks safe for the time being.
Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray: We aren’t enjoying this any more than you are.
Yes, hurray for Roddick! I think he will do marginally well on clay, running on victory fumes from American hard court success. Nadal will come all the way back to find some former glory on clay and Roger will gear himself to be ready for the French Open! I cannot wait for it all to unfold. I think Murray will be overtaken by Del Potro – assuming the Argentine recovers from his lingering injuries. Djokovic is also shaky! Kudos, Rob!!
Enjoyable read and, yes, great news for Andy. I'm delighted with this win. I was seriously impressed not only by his play but his willingness to address the problem (like losing that first set to Rafa), and come back with a different tactic. Brave and bold, and those are formidable weapons to add to the already fit, dedicated, big serving Roddick.
He will have his work cut out on clay, as there have been some great comeback performances from the clay experts in recent weeks, too. The Spanish spring to mind.
And Federer will have to come up with something good soon if he's to keep his rivals at bay. The aura slipped just a fraction in north America.
Very nice discussion, Rob. This year is shaping up very nicely, with some new names to talk about, and some favorites showing staying power. I for one am enjoying the resurgence of not only Tomas Berdych, but also Ivan Ljubcic. Both are wonderful talents who had issues in the past (and maybe in the future too), but as Andy Roddick said in his losing speech at IW, tennis would be robbed if Ivan were to decide his career was done.
I'm thrilled to pieces for Andy to finally exhibit the more well rounded tennis skills that we expect of him (OK, we have high expectations, as do all countrymen of their native sons!)
I'm also thrilled with Rafa's play, though I note the commies talking about him not truly being back yet to his 2008 form (will he ever be?)
I'm not worried about Roger. His performance against Andy in the AO this year was sublime. Perhaps his best tennis.
I"m more worried about Andy. He threw everything in his considerable arsenal at Roger and came up short, and he has not yet recovered from that. Now the talk is that other's have learn him, learned from him, and moved beyond him. Nonetheless, Andy is young, and there should be plenty of time for him to achieve the top tier of the sport with a major win.
I think Novak just has a lot on his plate, with being a serious Davis Cup contenda, and also working the Belgrade tournament. He still has plenty of points, and he might be the second best clay courter on tour right now. (How would you compare Roger and Novak in terms of ranking on clay?? – maybe the theme of a future article.)