Selection of Jack Butler Brings Out the Best and Worst in the Pro Football Hall of Fame
Though he retired in 1959, it took until 2012 for Jack Butler to get serious consideration for the Pro Football Hall of Fame.
Let me start this post by saying that after watching his gleeful interview during the NFL Network Hall of Fame show I am pleased that 84-year-old Jack Butler is able to enjoy his moment as a new member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame.
However, in my opinion it is the selection of Butler that best illustrates what is wrong with the selection process for the Hall of Fame.
If given the chance to ask one question to the Pro Football Hall of Fame selection committee it simply would be: “Why is an 84-year-old who last played in the NFL in 1959 being selected to the Hall of Fame in 2012?”
I’m not really sure whether Butler deserves to be in the Hall of Fame or not, but I am sure that the Hall of Fame selectors did a bad job in handling this selection.
Because, given that Butler had never previously even been a Hall of Fame finalist, the voters either were woefully negligent in not considering him before now or they caved in to a recent campaign by fans of the Pittsburgh Steelers to get Butler into the Hall of Fame.
Either way, the true loser in this scenario is the integrity of the Hall of Fame.
This marks the third straight year that a senior candidate that had never previously been a Hall of Fame finalist suddenly found himself not just as a finalist, but as one of those chosen to enter the Hall of Fame.
You can argue all day regarding the individual merits of Butler, Les Richter, Dick LeBeau and Floyd Little, but I have a hard time understanding why if they really deserved to be in the Hall of Fame that each one was eligible for the Hall of Fame for more than 30 years (nearly 50 for Richter and Butler) before they even made it into the discussion room.
If they were deserving candidates, then someone did a pretty bad job screening candidates over the years. And, I certainly am not ruling that out of the equation.
I previously have written several columns listing the players I felt were most deserving of being inducted into the Hall of Fame, but are not yet in Canton. Among that list are three candidates that I think all deserve to be in the HOF, but have never even been finalists in Cliff Branch, Chuck Howley and Drew Pearson.
Former Oakland Raiders great Cliff Branch is among a handful of deserving Hall of Fame candidates that have never been selection finalists.
Unfortunately, the Hall of Fame selectors of today are paying for two issues from the past. The first is a system that has always been done behind closed doors and allowed for biases among committee members against individuals, teams and positions to dictate who received a bust and who was left waiting.
The second issue, which really is a result of the first problem, is that for many years the Hall of Fame selectors seemed determined to keep the number of players in the Hall of Fame as small as possible. This has led to a back-log of great players who now have been out of the NFL for 30 or more years and have never received their due consideration or who have been forgotten as new players have become eligible.
Since going to the current finalist system in 1970, the Hall of Fame has been able to induct as many as seven people each year. Yet, that total has been reached only six times, with two of those coming in 2010 and 2011.
From 1972 through 1986, the largest class of inductees was five and twice only three players were selected.
After twice having classes of seven inductees in a four year span between 1987 and 1990 (with those classes surrounding four-member classes in 1988 and 1989), the pattern of smaller classes returned for the next decade as there was just one class with six inductees between 1991 and 2001.
Then after a seven-member class in 2001 gave hope that the selectors might start dealing with the growing back-log of great players not in the Hall of Fame, they reverted to previous form with four-player classes in 2004 and 2005.
It would be one thing if the selectors had been evaluating different players each year and deciding their merit, but instead it seems that the system is more focused on making players wait until their “turn” than in bringing multiple players through the evaluation process and deciding their merits.
Of the 66 players, coaches and administrators who were Hall of Fame finalists during the decade of the 1970s, 55 eventually were inducted into the Hall of Fame, but only 15 were chosen in their first year of eligibility.
Since the back-to-back four Hall of Famer years of 2004 and 2005, 25 people who were eligible for induction during that time have now been selected for the Hall of Fame.
My contention with all of these scenarios is that these players never added a tackle, rushing yard or touchdown to their resume during those extra years, so what made them more worthy later than they were in the earlier years?
Unfortunately, what ends up happening is that players or coaches who were worthy of being in the Hall of Fame have waited so long for induction that by the time they actually get into the Hall of Fame they either have passed away or are in failing health and unable to enjoy their special moment. That was the case last year for Les Richter, who was 79 when he passed away six months before his selection into the HOF.
I am glad that at age 84 Jack Butler is healthy enough to enjoy his Hall of Fame moment. But if a player is indeed worthy of this honor, I contend it is the responsibility of the Hall of Fame committee to make sure former players get this recognition while in their 40s or 50s instead of waiting until their later years. Especially given that so many football players don’t end up living to be in their 70s and 80s.
In my opinion, the most obvious omission among former players for the Hall of Fame is former Green Bay Packer lineman Jerry Kramer. Kramer was a Hall of Fame finalist in his first year of eligibility in 1974 and then over the next 23 years was a finalist 10 times without being selected. For some reason, he was last a Hall of Fame finalist in 1997.
But, even though I think he is a worthy candidate, at least Kramer had his candidacy vetted during the years in which many of the committee members were people who actually saw him play. That hasn’t been the case for Butler, Richter, Little and LeBeau as all were never finalists during their regular eligibility period and were chosen as senior candidates.
When looking across all positions, I think you can easily argue that there are at least 25-30 former players who are deserving of Hall of Fame induction, but do not yet have a plaque in Canton.
As I have outlined, the primary reason for this is a long-time systematic problem with the selection process.
With the Hall of Fame turning 50 in 2013, I see it as the perfect opportunity for the administration to right many wrongs and have a large class to unclog the pipeline and ensure that anyone who played prior to 1985 and is worthy of Hall of Fame selection is given a bust in the Hall of Fame.
Then, I would institute a 15-year policy like in baseball meaning that a player would be eligible for the Hall of Fame only for 15 years and then by the end of that time they would either be in the Hall of Fame and able to annually enjoy their place among the all-time greats or they would no longer be eligible and able to go on with the rest of their life without annually wondering if this might be the year.
That process would still give voters some chance to throw their weight around by making players wait for a few years, but it would hopefully also spur them to have meaningful discussions and evaluations of all potential players from an era without having to compare players from far different eras of football.
Of course it is highly unlikely that such radical a change would ever be made, but I believe it would help make induction in the Pro Football Hall of Fame an even more meaningful honor and ensure that a greater number of inductees are able to enjoy the annual festivities.
Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really neatly written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and come back to learn extra of your helpful information. Thank you for the post. I’ll definitely comeback.
howdy-do. Fantastic text and a fantastic blog
greetings. Awesome post and a great blog
I enjoy what you guys are usually up too. This type of clever work and reporting! Keep up the amazing works guys I’ve included you guys to blogroll.
I think that is one of the such a lot significant info for me. And i’m satisfied studying your article. But want to remark on few general things, The site style is ideal, the articles is in reality nice : D. Just right task, cheers
I don’t even understand how I finished up right here, but I believed this put up used to be good. I do not know who you’re however certainly you are going to a well-known blogger when you are not already. Cheers!
Moronic piece of writing. Only succeeds in showing your ignorance and home town bias.
I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this hike.
hi-ya. Good text and a great blog
I simply could not leave your site prior to suggesting that I really loved the usual information a person provide in your guests? Is going to be back continuously to check up on new posts
Thx for your post. I would like to write my opinion that the price of car insurance varies greatly from one insurance policy to another, since there are so many different facets which contribute to the overall cost. Such as, the brand name of the automobile will have a tremendous bearing on the charge. A reliable outdated family vehicle will have an inexpensive premium than the usual flashy racecar.
I am grateful for your post. I would really like to write my opinion that the price of car insurance differs from one policy to another, for the reason that there are so many different facets which contribute to the overall cost. As an example, the make and model of the car will have a massive bearing on the charge. A reliable ancient family vehicle will have a less expensive premium when compared to a flashy fancy car.
Quality information, great blog theme, carry on the great work
Visited your web blog through Bing. You already know I will be subscribing to your feed.
Good details! I have been browsing for some thing like that for a while finally. With thanks!
The main element word when shopping for something can be cheap’. If it is cheap, it is worthwhile considering and that’s setup that a most shoppers acquire after they wish to buy everything. S better to buy a low-cost fresh car or a inexpensive car or truck? A fresh one is going to be positive, nevertheless, you can’t examine the of these two when it comes to simply how much you want to spend simply because regardless how lower the purchase price is good for a new vehicle, it could never be as little as car or truck. Utilized autos are actually inexpensive in price tag because they’re used. There’s a threshold to the price tag that they’ll charge in spite of the style. This implies that one could decide on whatever car you want yet still obtain it an inexpensive cost. Addititionally there is area for settling, according to whom you are dealing with. The price tag on a brand new vehicle will vary, along with the more affordable it can be, the bottom the product quality. Similarly with regard to utilised cars, the particular cheaper it is, the larger the risk that the vehicle has a few main problems or even it’s run down. Nevertheless you can continue to retrieve a great price for the good programmed car. In apparent phrases, the cost of a brand new automobile is established, in general, from the design, variety, company and other associated aspects. The buying price of a good car on the other hand is dependent upon the complete issue to your better extent. Therefore inexpensive new vehicles should never be since reasonably priced while inexpensive used automobiles across all the types. Buying a pre-owned auto is a straightforward task. You can get a used car by looking at the local dealer and searching classified ads within magazine or perhaps website. Distinct site enables people in locating good shape automobiles with inexpensive rates. In order to get a auto with confidence, you must aware about diverse facts. To start with, a person forced to pick a design that you are interested. Check your budget for your vehicle and appearance away different types that could effortlessly receive in which budget. Assess and deal kinds of and choose the main one fit the bill best. Right after selection, just as one energetic customer examine all the required information related to select design and browse concerning the options that come with the vehicle. Fulfill different retailers to compare costs with the selected car. Invest in a test drive. During the try out, you can even examine different essential factors. History of the vehicle: Confirm the history of your selected automobile. It could be validated on the internet as well as adjust the car detection quantity. It will help a person to find out there whether the pre-owned car recently met with some incident you aren’t. You can verify in the event that car was reported taken via VIN. You’ll be able to need the actual logbook from the vehicle. This specific logbook will allow you to within learning the routine maintenance report. Take a test drive of 3 in order to Four km traveling with different circumstances. You can also get the help of a trusted auto mechanic to discover the excellence of the powerplant. You can also requirement for a number of warranty. If a few manufacturer’s warranty is provided with the supplier, read the different parts come under guarantee time period. Using used designs, you’ve large possibilities to locate outstanding bargains. This really is mainly because that more plus more drivers can sell his or her new automobiles inside A few calendar year of buying. That benefits as a optimistic point of individuals searching for pre-owned vehicles. Cheap Used Car
You made several fine points there. I did a search on the matter and found most folks will have the same opinion with your blog.
Motorcycle Lids is a defensive go products put on by simply motorbike cyclists. Motorbike safety factors are the principal aim in the helmet. The particular helmet might help shield, prevent or even decrease the head injury that can help save your bikers living.
I have been browsing on-line more than 3 hours as of late, yet I by no means discovered any attention-grabbing article like yours. It¡¦s pretty price sufficient for me. Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will likely be a lot more helpful than ever before.
I carry on listening to the news broadcast speak about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the finest site to get one. Could you advise me please, where could i acquire some?
You made some decent points there. I looked on the internet for the issue and found most persons will approve with your website.
hi there, perfect blog site, and a fairly good understand! 1 for my favorites.
Valuable information. Lucky me I discovered your site accidentally, and I am shocked why this accident did not took place in advance! I bookmarked it.
This (and the Pagani Zonda) have been featured in the British “Top Gear” TV program. What awesome motorcars!
Dean, I indeed think that the HoF has done a pretty bad job screening candidates over the years. Jack Butler is I think very much deserving of HoF membership.
For me, the real tragedy here is that the other Senior candidate, the equally deserving Dick Stanfel, was voted down. He was arguably the best guard from the 50s, with postseason honors of 5(5AP)/5/50s, even better then the honors profile of the HoF deserving Jerry Kramer from the 60s. Currently, there is only one HoF-er who played a significant amount of time at the position from the 50s, Stan Jones. And one can make an argument that not just Stanfel, but also Dick Barwegan and Duane Putnam, belong in — the HoF is significantly slighting the position for this decade as well as the 60s.