2010 Australian Open Review: For Roger Federer – Can 17 Be Far Behind? 13
Those of us who deliberately sabotaged our sleep patterns to watch the Australian Open these past two weeks found we arrived almost exactly where we expected since the draws were announced. That is not to say that we did not experience some thrilling matches as counterpunchers reigned early and aggressors stayed late.
We rather expected one of the “unretired” Belgians to survive that tough third quarter of the women’s draw to face Serena Williams in the final. That it was Justine Henin who charged to the finish line made the women’s championship match that much more intriguing because the rivalry between the sturdy American and the miniature French woman is steeped in silent, stoney resentment.
Serena won the championship in three tough sets 6-4, 3-6, 6-2. But we expect the rivalry to blossom once again, especially as the tour heads into the clay season and spills onto the storied grounds of Stade Roland Garros where the Belgian will surely shine once again.
But more so –– we expected Roger Federer to be standing on one side of the net during the men’s final. Oh, yes, there was talk about the recent dominance of Nikolay Davydenko and the quiet resurgence of Novak Djokovic. That is not to discount the sultry passion of the other Spaniard, Fernando, the body, Verdasco or the raw athleticism of Jo Wilfried Tsonga whose smile lights up the world.
Ultimately, however, Federer in a five set major is going to make it to the final –– consult the oddsmakers. Read the rest of this entry →