Is The Super Bowl Bigger Than Rugby’s Six Nations Championship? Comments

In Some places, the Rugby Six Nations Championship is bigger than the Super Bowl.
You’d be forgiven—if you are American—for thinking that the entire sporting world fell into awed silence as the brouhaha that is Super Bowl swept along everyone with even the faintest of pulses.
And of course this year’s spectacle had the extra wow factor of an emotional New Orleans back-story: underdog, triumph over adversity, not a dry eye in the house.
For many on the other side of “the pond,” though, that New Orleans back-story was the front story, too, because American football remains an impenetrable anachronism for most of us…well for this particular correspondent, anyway!
So last weekend, our focus was rather more Euro-centred. While the padded up and helmeted Superbowl heroes began their campaign to the predetermined rhythm of the broadcasters’ advertising breaks, its stripped down, bare-knuckled equivalent—the Six Nations Championship—was just getting under way.
This is a competition where deep-rooted loyalties have been determined by the history books, with the English the common foe. It may be hundreds of years since a king Edward or a king Henry strode into Scotland or Wales, Ireland or France, but an unspoken resentment still simmers in the veins.
That complex tapestry of history, married with the visceral sport that is rugby union, makes the Six Nations championship one of the most intense and compelling competitions in sport.
Which is Bigger? The Super Bowl or the Rugby Six Nations Championship?
- Six Nations Championship (46%, 6 Votes)
- Super Bowl (31%, 4 Votes)
- Doesn't Matter, the World Cup is Bigger Than Both (23%, 3 Votes)
Total Voters: 13




